Program
Evaluation
for
STEM
Pre-Engineering
Biomedical
School __________________________________________________
Date of
Report __________________________________________________
Program __________________________________________________
Teacher __________________________________________________
Evaluator(s) __________________________________________________
Revised October
2008
INTRODUCTION
The Summary Evaluation
Questionnaire was developed to assist in evaluating the instructional processes
of vocational programs. It is
designed for use by both the local teacher in conducting a comprehensive
self-evaluation and by an external evaluation team. The questionnaire is divided into 11
sections, corresponding to the 11 standards of quality program operations. These standards or “best practices” have
been endorsed by the State Board of Career and Technology
Education.
Each standard is followed by
a series of rating scale questions or Quality Indicators that further define the
standard. Some questions are
identified as State Board Rules, and these questions must be met in order to
meet the standard. The Quality
Indicators may vary among occupational divisions due to unique consideration
within those divisions. The sum
total rankings of the State Board Rules and Quality Indicators below each
standard will serve as a ranking of the standard. The ranking of each standard and the
corresponding narrative section will be recorded and reported in the final
evaluation report.
DIRECTIONS
Evaluations using this
instrument should strive to rate the Quality Indicators for each program
evaluated in relationship to the standards. Comparing one vocational program with
another may result in distorting evaluative information and is highly
discouraged.
Questionnaire
Rating
To complete the
questionnaire, carefully read each standard and the Quality Indicators that
follow. Questions related to State
Board Rules are enclosed in a shaded area and are grouped at the beginning of
each standard. For each question,
the evaluator should indicate if the State Board Rules are met or not
met by marking the appropriate box in the column on the
right.
o
Met
o
Not
Met
All other Quality Indicators
are assessed by circling the appropriate rating in the column on the right. The numbers on the rating scale indicate
the following:
5=Outstanding
Exceeds
Standard
4=Above Minimum Standard
Meets
Standard 3=Meets Minimum Standard
2=Below Minimum Standard
Falls Below Standard
Suggested Activities for
Evaluator
For
each standard, there is a suggested list of documents to review or activities to
perform as the evaluator rates the standard. The evaluator should use these
suggestions as a guide but not as a limitation in reviewing the
program.
Narrative
Comments
The
Comments Section of the questionnaire should be used to note specific program
characteristics for which recommendations or commendations need to be made. Items rated below standard should be
accompanied by realistic statements on how they can be improved. These notes should be used to write the
Commendations and Strengths Section, the Specific Recommendations for
Improvement Section, and the General Suggestions for Improvement Section at the
conclusion of the evaluation (see pages following Standard
11.)
Scoring
Totals (Evaluators Only)
To
determine if a standard is met, the evaluator should:
1
Determine if all State Board
Rules are met.
2
a Sum the ratings in the column on the
right to find the total points.
b Compare the Total Points to Minimum
Points Needed to Meet the Standard as stated at the end of the
standard.
c If any questions were not applicable, use
the chart at the end of the standard to determine the Minimum Points Needed to
Meet the Standard. (The Total
Number of Questions Rated should include the questions related to State Board
Rules.)
Example
Sum
the ratings in the preceding columns ........................................................................................... 45 Total Points
In
order to meet the standard, all State Board Rules must be met and the total
points must equal or exceed 36___
If
any questions are not applicable, the chart below can be used to determine the
total points needed to meet the standard. (The Number of Questions Rated should include the questions related to
State Board Rules.)
Based
upon the Quality Indicators, which reflect State Board Rules and factors
influencing the quality of the occupational program, the standard is o Met o Not Met.
PROGRAM
STANDARDS
FOR
THE EVALUATION
OF
OCCUPATIONAL PROGRAMS
STANDARD
1 Instructional Planning and Organization
STANDARD
2 Instructional Materials Utilization
STANDARD
3 Qualified Instructional Personnel
STANDARD
4 Enrollment and Student/Teacher Ratio
STANDARD
5 Equipment and Supplies
STANDARD
6 Instructional Facilities
STANDARD
7 Safety Training and Practices
STANDARD
8 Advisory Committee and Community Relations
STANDARD
9 Leadership Development
STANDARD
10 Coordination Activities
STANDARD
11 Student Accounting and Reports
INSTRUCTIONAL
PLANNING AND ORGANIZATION
STANDARD
ONE
The instructional
program should be designed to impart knowledge and develop skills that are
essential for success in meeting the students’ educational objectives. There should be evidence that each
instructional unit has been properly planned and organized and is being
implemented in a sequential manner. The programs should implement a fairly administered grading system that
is based upon identified criteria.
The course of study
for each program shall include both theory and skill lessons along with other
supplemental learning activities that will serve to guide the program toward
desirable learning outcomes. In
addition, the course of study shall be integrated and organized in such a manner
as to effect an overall well-balanced program of
instruction.
Levels of Assessment
Interpretation of Level
4 –
Excellent Exceeds program standards.
3 –
Good Meets program standards. No need for additional technical assistance at
this time, although some areas, as indicated, could be improved.
2 –
Needs Improvement Generally falls below program standards. Demonstrates limited
effectiveness; additional technical assistance and/or resource utilization is
needed for improvement.
1 –
Poor or Missing Evidences little or no effectiveness. A great deal of technical
assistance and/or resource utilization would be an immediate need.
N/A – Not Applicable
Does not apply to the program being reviewed.
INSTRUCTIONAL
PLANNING AND ORGANIZATION
STANDARD
ONE
Implementation
Schedule of PLTW courses:
Describe
how sequence of courses were determined and how math and science requirements
for state and post-secondary will be met.
INSTRUCTIONAL
MATERIALS UTILIZATION
STANDARD
TWO
The availability and
proper utilization of instructional materials is considered essential to
conducting quality training. Schools offering programs shall ensure that adequate amounts of such
materials, including state instructional materials, audio visual aids, reference
texts, competency profiles, etc., are made available for instructional
purposes. Teachers shall utilize a
variety of instructional materials and methods in accordance with student needs
and the goals and objectives of the program.
Concurrent
Mathematics:
Describe the
procedures in place to ensure each student is concurrently enrolled in a college
preparatory mathematics course.
Extra Help:
What types of
academic extra help do students have access to?
Have Plans been
developed in order to keep all essential equipment (i.e., furniture, equipment,
tools, technology, etc.) up-to-date and high-tech? Please explain.
QUALIFIED
INSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL
STANDARD
THREE
Selecting,
developing, and retaining instructional staff who are competent to meet the
needs of career and technology education is vital to the success of the
instructor program. As evidence or
proper preparation, all CareerTech instructors shall meet or exceed state
certification requirements and will hold a current teaching certificate or
credential appropriate to their subject area. In addition to these minimums, all
instructors should continuously strive to upgrade their skills and knowledge by
meeting recertification requirements and attending professional improvement
meetings, state conferences, etc.
Teacher
Selection
Describe
the criteria used to identify and recruit teachers for PLTW
courses.
For
any score of “2” or below, please provide a brief
explanation:
ENROLLMENT AND
STUDENT/TEACHER RATIO
STANDARD
FOUR
The teaching load
(student/teacher ratio) will vary with the program, contingent upon the
number/kinds of students to be served, the specific skills to be taught, the
size of the facility, and the methods of instruction to be used. However, reasonable enrollment limits
must be maintained in order to ensure that programs objectives may be met in an
efficient and effective manner. Unless otherwise specified, program enrollment limits shall be maintained
in each program in accordance with the state operations and procedures
requirements.
Students
Enrollment Data Pre-Engineering
Selection
and Recruitment:
%
of Free and Reduced Lunches: _____
Describe the process
and criteria used to enroll students in the PLTW™ program.
BioMedical
Selection
and Recruitment:
%
of Free and Reduced Lunches: _____
Describe the process
and criteria used to enroll students in the PLTW™ program.
EQUIPMENT AND
SUPPLIES
STANDARD
FIVE
Proper equipment and
adequate supplies must be made available to support the program. Schools offering CareerTech programs
shall provide funds for equipment and supplies in accordance with acceptable
standards and at a level to ensure quality education. Equipment selected should be
representative of the grade and must meet or exceed all appropriate safety
standards.
INSTRUCTIONAL
FACILITIES
STANDARD
SIX
Physical facilities
for programs shall include adequate space and utilities in classrooms,
laboratories, and shop areas that provide for safe and orderly, quality
instruction to meet the program’s objectives. Both instructional and non-instructional
areas, including storage areas, restrooms, and offices, shall be adequate for
the number of students and staff using such areas. Special consideration shall be given to
meeting the needs of students with disabilities as well as providing for the
special needs of co-educational classes. Clinical facilities shall be adequate in number and quality to provide
the experiences necessary for an effective program and must meet the
requirements of the respective accrediting agency.
SAFETY TRAINING AND
PRACTICES
STANDARD
SEVEN
Due to the nature of
career and technology education and related employment, student safety and
safety education are considered essential to quality program operations. Schools
offering programs shall ensure that safety features in the instructional
facilities and equipment are properly implemented and maintained. In addition, adequate lighting,
temperature, and ventilation shall be provided to ensure a safe and healthy
learning environment. The
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards shall be used to
guide the implementation of environmental health and safety
features.
Instructors shall
model correct safety practices and ensure that safety training is incorporated
into the instructional content of the educational program. Student safety
practices shall also be encouraged and continuously monitored by the
instructor.
PROGRAM ADVISORY
COMMITTEE AND COMMUNITY RELATIONS
STANDARD
EIGHT
An effective and
continuous program of community relations is necessary to maintain a close
working relationship with business, industry, and other organizations and
individuals, as well as to ensure that education is relevant to the needs of
students. The purpose of a
community relations effort is to inform the public of the program’s operations
and capabilities and to generate active participation in the development and
implementation of the program’s goals.
Each program should
actively strive to encourage community involvement and to promote a greater
understanding of the program’s needs and accomplishments. In addition, each program shall have a
formally organized program advisory committee that is broadly representative of
the school community and of the business and industrial community it
serves. Each local program shall
maintain on file a list of the names and occupations of the advisory committee
members and the minutes of each meeting.
III. Partnership
Team (Documentation to be provided at site visit.)
A.
Membership
Provide a list of
the Partnership Team members that include the following:
"Member's Name
"Title/Role (must include non-school members, i.e., business/industry) "Name of
Business
B.
Frequency
Provide copies of
the agendas from two previous meetings and a calendar or meeting dates of the
next two meetings.
C.
Minutes: Provide the minutes of the previous two
Partnerships Team Meetings.
Communication and
Outreach
For any score of “2”
or below, please provide a brief explanation.
LEADERSHIP
DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD
NINE
Student leadership
development activities are considered an integral part of the course of
instruction in all programs. Each
student shall be afforded the opportunity to become an active member of an
appropriate student organization. The leadership development activities associated with the student
organization shall be directed and supervised by the local teacher with guidance
from the local school administration and the state supervisory
staff.
COORDINATION/CLINICAL
ACTIVITIES
STANDARD
TEN
Cooperative
education is uniquely designed to meet students’ career major objectives through
supervised experiences, coupled with regular classroom instruction. Each student participating should be
placed in an experience related to his/her area of study. The instructor should ensure that each
student’s cooperative experience provides skills that allow the student to meet
the goals and objectives of his/her program. A “Memorandum of Training” shall be
signed by the student, parent (if applicable), and teacher-coordinator and shall
be maintained on file.
In order to ensure
quality of training and procedural compliance, the local teacher-coordinator
shall visit or oversee the experience as outlined by state and national
accreditation standards. Students
should be encouraged to develop teacher-assisted entrepreneurship programs,
where such programs are related to the instructional content of the training
program.
If this standard is
not applicable, check here __________.
STUDENT ACCOUNTING
AND REPORTS
STANDARD
ELEVEN
Recognizing that the
objective of CareerTech education is to educate a student to be work
ready/college bound, a systematic program of follow-up is essential. As evidence of efforts to achieve this
objective, each local educational institution shall maintain student enrollment,
placement, and follow-up records on all students who have enrolled in programs. These records must be maintained in
accordance with divisional requirements and reported as requested to the
Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education.
In exploratory
programs or in programs where students move from Program I to Program II,
completers should be assisted in continuing their education. Enrollment, placement, continuing
education, and follow-up records should be maintained for these
programs.
Participation in
Data Collection
Project Lead The
Way® has contracted with
True Outcomes to conduct annual assessments of the PLTW™ program. PLTW™ student
data is collected through an online registration process with teacher grade
input. Long term, the data will be used to determine the success of the PLTW™
program in relation to increasing the number and diversity of high school
graduates who successfully pursue careers in engineering and engineering
technology. For more information, go to www.trueoutcomes.net/ pltw.
Provide a copy of
the printed page from the true outcomes website which shows the school’s
participation.
Oklahoma Department
of Career and Technology Education
PROGRAM EVALUATION
PROFILE
Instructor______________________________________________________________________
Program_______________________________________________________________________
School________________________________________________________________________
Date__________________________________________________________________________
Chairman______________________________________________________________________
Standard Standard
Met Not
Met*
*Refer to Specific
Recommendations for Improvement
INTRODUCTION
Include a brief
description of the program, number of teachers, type of students served,
enrollment, program length, and any unique information about the
program.
COMMENDATIONS OR
STRENGTHS
Summarize below the
major strengths of the program. Include outstanding accomplishments of students and/or the student
organization.
SPECIFIC
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT
Outline specific
recommendations for program improvement that should be implemented in order for
the program to meet minimum standards. Each standard that was found to be deficient should be identified and
recommendations for improvement made.
GENERAL SUGGESTIONS
FOR IMPROVEMENT
Outline general
suggestions for the overall improvement of the program.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||